lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061031102222.7ab1ed6b@freekitty>
Date:	Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:22:22 -0800
From:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...l.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	peter.hicks@...gs.co.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Thousands of interfaces

On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 01:31:54 -0800 (PST)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:

> From: Peter Hicks <peter.hicks@...gs.co.uk>
> Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:25:50 +0000
> 
> [ Discussion belongs on netdev@...r.kernel.org, added to CC: ]
> 
> > I have a dual 3GHz Xeon machine with a 2.4.21 kernel and thousands (15k+) of
> > ipip tunnel interfaces.  These are being used to tunnel traffic from remote
> > routers, over a private network, and handed off to a third party.
>  ...
> > Is it possible to speed up creation of the interfaces?  Currently it takes
> > around 24 hours.  Is there are more efficient way to handle a very large
> > number of IP-IP tunnels?  Would upgrading to a 2.6 kernel be of use?
> 


2.4 has a several N^2 searches for interfaces (and is in deep freeze by now).
2.6 had several changes to handle 1000's of interfaces.


-- 
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...l.org>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ