linux-kernel - Re: Linux 2.6.19-rc4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <454797CB.7030404@google.com>
Date:	Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:36:59 -0800
From:	Martin Bligh <mbligh@...gle.com>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
CC:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.19-rc4

Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 08:14:32AM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> 
>>...
>>PS. I still think -Werror is a good plan. But I acknowledge that's
>>fairly extreme.
> 
> 
> Note that this would imply options like -Wno-unused-function and
> -Wno-unused-variable (unless you _really_ want to add a few thousand 
> #ifdef's to the kernel).

I don't think so. We already do this inside Google, and it works fine.
I just had about 20 stupid warnings to fix up for 2.6.18. Might depend
which gcc it was, but 4.1 seemed to work OK with that, at least.

M.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/