linux-kernel - Re: Linux 2.6.19-rc4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20061031192613.GB26625@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:26:13 +0000
From:	Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
To:	"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@...gle.com>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.19-rc4

On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 08:14:32AM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> >But I've become innoculated against warnings, just because we have too 
> >many of the totally useless noise about deprecation and crud, and ppc has 
> >it's own set of bogus compiler-and-linker-generated warnings..
> >
> >At some point we should get rid of all the "politeness" warnings, just 
> >because they can end up hiding the _real_ ones.
> 
> Yay! Couldn't agree more. Does this mean you'll take patches for all the
> uninitialized variable crap from gcc 4.x ?

Why not apply pressure to gcc people to fix their compiler warning bugs
instead?

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/