[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200610312126.k9VLQtCB003616@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:26:55 -0500
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Cc: ray-gmail@...rabbit.org, "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@...gle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.19-rc4
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:51:33 EST, Dave Jones said:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 08:34:23AM -0800, Ray Lee wrote:
> > On 10/31/06, Martin J. Bligh <mbligh@...gle.com> wrote:
> > > > At some point we should get rid of all the "politeness" warnings, just
> > > > because they can end up hiding the _real_ ones.
> > >
> > > Yay! Couldn't agree more. Does this mean you'll take patches for all the
> > > uninitialized variable crap from gcc 4.x ?
> >
> > What would be useful in the short term is a tool that shows only the
> > new warnings that didn't exist in the last point release.
>
> git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/remapper.git
As somebody proves me wrong on the fact it's not easy. Of course, it's
Al's git tree, which is probably saying something. :)
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists