linux-kernel - Re: Linux 2.6.19-rc4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200610312126.k9VLQtCB003616@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date:	Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:26:55 -0500
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Cc:	ray-gmail@...rabbit.org, "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@...gle.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.19-rc4

On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:51:33 EST, Dave Jones said:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 08:34:23AM -0800, Ray Lee wrote:
>  > On 10/31/06, Martin J. Bligh <mbligh@...gle.com> wrote:
>  > > > At some point we should get rid of all the "politeness" warnings, just
>  > > > because they can end up hiding the _real_ ones.
>  > >
>  > > Yay! Couldn't agree more. Does this mean you'll take patches for all the
>  > > uninitialized variable crap from gcc 4.x ?
>  > 
>  > What would be useful in the short term is a tool that shows only the
>  > new warnings that didn't exist in the last point release.
> 
> git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/remapper.git

As somebody proves me wrong on the fact it's not easy.  Of course, it's
Al's git tree, which is probably saying something. :)

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped