[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061030200053.f9836cce.pj@sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 20:00:53 -0800
From: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To: "Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>
Cc: akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow a larger buffer for writes to cpuset files
Paul M wrote:
> @@ -1292,7 +1292,7 @@ static ssize_t cpuset_common_file_write(
> int retval = 0;
>
> /* Crude upper limit on largest legitimate cpulist user might write. */
> - if (nbytes > 100 + 6 * NR_CPUS)
> + if (nbytes >= PAGE_SIZE)
On a system with 4 Kbyte pages, this imposes a tighter limit
if NR_CPUS is > 666.
On a system with 16 Kbyte pages, this imposes a tighter limit
if NR_CPUS is > 2714.
Those CPU counts don't look that futuristic to me.
And it makes the limit more aribitrary ... like what the heck does
that check have to do with PAGE_SIZE ?
How about coding for the possibility that either NR_CPUS or MAX_NUMNODES
is larger, and removing 'cpu' from the comment:
/* Crude upper limit on largest legitimate list user might write. */
if (nbytes > 100 + 6 * max(NR_CPUS, MAX_NUMNODES))
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists