linux-kernel - Re: [patch 1/1] schedule removal of FUTEX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 01 Nov 2006 01:05:56 +0100
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, drepper@...hat.com,
	mingo@...e.hu, rusty@...tcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] schedule removal of FUTEX_FD

On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 23:48 +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> Ar Maw, 2006-10-31 am 15:09 -0800, ysgrifennodd akpm@...l.org:
> > From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
> > 
> > Apparently FUTEX_FD is unfixably racy and nothing uses it (or if it does, it
> > shouldn't).
> > 
> > Add a warning printk, give any remaining users six months to migrate off it.
> 
> Andrew - please use time based rate limits for this sort of thing, that
> way you actually get to see who is actually using it. 

Not really: It might be one time calls, so a time based rate limit might
exclude apps which get executed in a row.

Maybe some thread->deprecated bitfield which rate limits the deprecated
warning per caller would be an alternative solution. We should not have
more than 32 of such deprecated functions at once. Of cource it would
still spam the logs when high frequency forking servers use such
interfaces, but I think the probability is low.

	tglx

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/