[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061031.165314.39158827.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:53:14 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: clameter@....com
Cc: hch@....de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@....sgi.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] add dev_to_node()
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:10:48 -0800 (PST)
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, David Miller wrote:
>
> > So, please add some sanity to this situation and just put the node
> > into the generic struct device. :-)
>
> Good. Then we can remove the node from the pci structure and get rid of
> pcibus_to_node?
Yes, that's possible, because the idea is that the arch specific
bus layer code would initialize the node value. Therefore, there
would be no need for things like pcibus_to_node() any longer.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists