[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45485046.6080508@in.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 13:14:06 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>
To: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
CC: dev@...nvz.org, vatsa@...ibm.com, sekharan@...ibm.com,
ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net, haveblue@...ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pj@....com, matthltc@...ibm.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, rohitseth@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] RFC: Memory Controller
Paul Menage wrote:
> On 10/31/06, Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com> wrote:
>> I thought this would be hard to do in general, but with a page -->
>> container mapping that will come as a result of the memory controller,
>> will it still be that hard?
>
> I meant that it's pretty much impossible with the current APIs
> provided by the kernel. That's why one of the most useful things that
> a memory controller can provide is accounting and limiting of page
> cache usage.
>
> Paul
Thanks for clarifying that! I completely agree, page cache control is
very important!
--
Balbir Singh,
Linux Technology Center,
IBM Software Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists