[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <454874AD.2070607@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 11:19:25 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, drepper@...hat.com,
mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] schedule removal of FUTEX_FD
Rusty Russell a écrit :
> On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 15:09 -0800, akpm@...l.org wrote:
>> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
>>
>> Apparently FUTEX_FD is unfixably racy and nothing uses it (or if it does, it
>> shouldn't).
>>
>> Add a warning printk, give any remaining users six months to migrate off it.
>
> This makes sense. FUTEX_FD was for the NGPT project which did userspace
> threading, and hence couldn't block. It was always kind of a hack
> (although unfixably racy isn't quite right, it depends on usage).
>
> However, the existence of FUTEX_FD is what made Ingo complain that we
> couldn't simply pin the futex page in memory, because now a process
> could pin one page per fd. Removing it would seem to indicate that we
> can return to a much simpler scheme of (1) pinning a page when someone
> does futex_wait, and (2) simply comparing futexes by physical address.
>
> Now, I realize with some dismay that simplicity is no longer a futex
> feature, but it might be worth considering?
Hum... I am not sure playing MM games is good... really...
This discussion reminds me I posted a patch some time ago that got no comments
from the community.
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/9/26
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists