Message-ID: <45487D2C.4000205@sw.ru>
Date:	Wed, 01 Nov 2006 13:55:40 +0300
From:	Kirill Korotaev <dev@...ru>
To:	Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
CC:	devel@...nvz.org, Vasily Averin <vvs@...ru>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Kirill Korotaev <dev@...nvz.org>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Olaf Hering <olh@...e.de>,
	Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [Devel] Re: [PATCH 2.6.19-rc3] VFS: per-sb dentry lru list

Neil Brown wrote:
> On Monday October 30, dev@...ru wrote:
> 
>>David,
>>
>>
>>>>The proposed fix prevents this issue by using per-sb dentry LRU list. It
>>>>provides very quickly search for the unused dentries for given super block thus
>>>>forcing shrinking always making good progress.
>>>
>>>
>>>We've been down this path before:
>>>
>>>http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=114861109717260&w=2
>>>
>>>A lot of comments on per-sb unused dentry lists were made in
>>>the threads associated with the above. other solutions were
>>>found to the problem that the above patch addressed, but I don't
>>>think any of them have made it to mainline yet. You might want
>>>to have a bit of a read of these threads first...
>>
>>The major difference between our patch and the one discussed in the link
>>it that we keep both global and per-sb dentry LRU lists.
>>Thus, when needed normal LRU is used and prune logic is unchanged,
>>while umount/remount use per-sb list and do its job faster.
> 
> 
> Yes, we have been down this path before - several times I think.
> Below is the patch that I like (not tested recently - just rediffed
> and reviewed).
> 
> NeilBrown
> 
> Subject: Reduce contention in dentry_unused when unmounting.
> 
> When we unmount a filesystem we need to release all dentries.
> We currently
>   - move a collection of dentries to the end of the dentry_unused list
>   - call prune_dcache to prune that number of dentries.
> 
> If lots of other dentries are added to the end of the list while
> the prune_dcache proceeds (e.g. another filesystem is unmounted),
> this can involve a lot of wasted time wandering through the
> list looking for dentries that we had previously found.
> 
> This patch allows the dentry_unused list to temporarily be multiple
> lists.
> When unmounting, dentries that are found to require pruning are moved
> to a temporary list, but accounted as though they were on dentry_unused.
> Then this list is passed to prune_dcache for freeing.  Any entries
> that are not pruned for whatever reason are added to the end of
> dentry_unused.
> 
> Also change shrink_dcache_sb to simply call shrink_dcache_parent.
> This avoids a long walk of the LRU.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
> 
> ### Diffstat output
>  ./fs/dcache.c |  104 ++++++++++++++++------------------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
> 
> diff .prev/fs/dcache.c ./fs/dcache.c
> --- .prev/fs/dcache.c	2006-10-31 15:22:10.000000000 +1100
> +++ ./fs/dcache.c	2006-10-31 15:37:22.000000000 +1100
> @@ -384,8 +384,8 @@ static void prune_one_dentry(struct dent
>  /**
>   * prune_dcache - shrink the dcache
>   * @count: number of entries to try and free
> - * @sb: if given, ignore dentries for other superblocks
> - *         which are being unmounted.
> + * @list: If given, remove from this list instead of
> + *        from dentry_unused.
>   *
>   * Shrink the dcache. This is done when we need
>   * more memory, or simply when we need to unmount
> @@ -394,11 +394,21 @@ static void prune_one_dentry(struct dent
>   *
>   * This function may fail to free any resources if
>   * all the dentries are in use.
> + *
> + * Any dentries that were not removed due to the @count
> + * limit will be splice on to the end of dentry_unused,
> + * so they should already be founded in dentry_stat.nr_unused.
>   */
>   
> -static void prune_dcache(int count, struct super_block *sb)
> +static void prune_dcache(int count, struct list_head *list)
>  {
> +	int have_list = list != NULL;
> +
>  	spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
> +	if (!have_list)
> +		/* use the dentry_unused list */
> +		list = &dentry_unused;
> +
>  	for (; count ; count--) {
>  		struct dentry *dentry;
>  		struct list_head *tmp;
> @@ -406,23 +416,11 @@ static void prune_dcache(int count, stru
>  
>  		cond_resched_lock(&dcache_lock);
>  
> -		tmp = dentry_unused.prev;
> -		if (sb) {
> -			/* Try to find a dentry for this sb, but don't try
> -			 * too hard, if they aren't near the tail they will
> -			 * be moved down again soon
> -			 */
> -			int skip = count;
> -			while (skip && tmp != &dentry_unused &&
> -			    list_entry(tmp, struct dentry, d_lru)->d_sb != sb) {
> -				skip--;
> -				tmp = tmp->prev;
> -			}
> -		}
> -		if (tmp == &dentry_unused)
> +		tmp = list->prev;
> +		if (tmp == list)
>  			break;
>  		list_del_init(tmp);
> -		prefetch(dentry_unused.prev);
> +		prefetch(list->prev);
>   		dentry_stat.nr_unused--;
>  		dentry = list_entry(tmp, struct dentry, d_lru);
>  
> @@ -455,7 +453,7 @@ static void prune_dcache(int count, stru
>  		 * If this dentry is for "my" filesystem, then I can prune it
>  		 * without taking the s_umount lock (I already hold it).
>  		 */
> -		if (sb && dentry->d_sb == sb) {
> +		if (have_list) {
>  			prune_one_dentry(dentry);
>  			continue;
>  		}
> @@ -485,68 +483,25 @@ static void prune_dcache(int count, stru
>   		list_add(&dentry->d_lru, &dentry_unused);
>  		dentry_stat.nr_unused++;
>  	}
> +	/* split any remaining entries back onto dentry_unused */
> +	if (have_list)
> +		list_splice(list, dentry_unused.prev);
>  	spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
>  }
>  
> -/*
> - * Shrink the dcache for the specified super block.
> - * This allows us to unmount a device without disturbing
> - * the dcache for the other devices.
> - *
> - * This implementation makes just two traversals of the
> - * unused list.  On the first pass we move the selected
> - * dentries to the most recent end, and on the second
> - * pass we free them.  The second pass must restart after
> - * each dput(), but since the target dentries are all at
> - * the end, it's really just a single traversal.
> - */
> -
>  /**
>   * shrink_dcache_sb - shrink dcache for a superblock
>   * @sb: superblock
>   *
>   * Shrink the dcache for the specified super block. This
> - * is used to free the dcache before unmounting a file
> - * system
> + * is used to reduce the dcache presence of a file system
> + * before re-mounting, and when invalidating the device
> + * holding a file system.
>   */
>  
>  void shrink_dcache_sb(struct super_block * sb)
>  {
> -	struct list_head *tmp, *next;
> -	struct dentry *dentry;
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Pass one ... move the dentries for the specified
> -	 * superblock to the most recent end of the unused list.
> -	 */
> -	spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
> -	list_for_each_safe(tmp, next, &dentry_unused) {
> -		dentry = list_entry(tmp, struct dentry, d_lru);
> -		if (dentry->d_sb != sb)
> -			continue;
> -		list_move(tmp, &dentry_unused);
> -	}
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Pass two ... free the dentries for this superblock.
> -	 */
> -repeat:
> -	list_for_each_safe(tmp, next, &dentry_unused) {
> -		dentry = list_entry(tmp, struct dentry, d_lru);
> -		if (dentry->d_sb != sb)
> -			continue;
> -		dentry_stat.nr_unused--;
> -		list_del_init(tmp);
> -		spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
> -		if (atomic_read(&dentry->d_count)) {
> -			spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
> -			continue;
> -		}
> -		prune_one_dentry(dentry);
> -		cond_resched_lock(&dcache_lock);
> -		goto repeat;
> -	}
> -	spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
> +	shrink_dcache_parent(sb->s_root);
<<<< AFAICS, doing so you introduced a leak of anonymous dentries.

d_alloc_anon() calls d_alloc() with parent == NULL, i.e. dentries have no parent
and are not linked to the sb->s_root...
BTW, looking at it, I found that s_anon field on super block is not used any more.
we can add BUG_ON(!hlist_empty(&sb->s_anon)) in generic_shutdown_super to avoid such issues like this.

maybe we can fix it adding something like:
while (!list_empty(&sb->s_anon)))
    prune_dcache(MAX_INT, &sb->s_anon);

>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -739,7 +694,7 @@ positive:
>  
>  /*
>   * Search the dentry child list for the specified parent,
> - * and move any unused dentries to the end of the unused
> + * and move any unused dentries to the end of a new unused
>   * list for prune_dcache(). We descend to the next level
>   * whenever the d_subdirs list is non-empty and continue
>   * searching.
> @@ -751,7 +706,7 @@ positive:
>   * drop the lock and return early due to latency
>   * constraints.
>   */
> -static int select_parent(struct dentry * parent)
> +static int select_parent(struct dentry * parent, struct list_head *new)
>  {
>  	struct dentry *this_parent = parent;
>  	struct list_head *next;
> @@ -775,7 +730,7 @@ resume:
>  		 * of the unused list for prune_dcache
>  		 */
>  		if (!atomic_read(&dentry->d_count)) {
> -			list_add_tail(&dentry->d_lru, &dentry_unused);
> +			list_add_tail(&dentry->d_lru, new);
>  			dentry_stat.nr_unused++;
>  			found++;
>  		}
> @@ -819,9 +774,10 @@ out:
>  void shrink_dcache_parent(struct dentry * parent)
>  {
>  	int found;
> +	LIST_HEAD(list);
>  
> -	while ((found = select_parent(parent)) != 0)
> -		prune_dcache(found, parent->d_sb);
> +	while ((found = select_parent(parent, &list)) != 0)
> +		prune_dcache(found, &list);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists