[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4548B13D.6070501@rtr.ca>
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 09:37:49 -0500
From: Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>, Conke Hu <conke.hu@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: AHCI should try to claim all AHCI controllers
Alan Cox wrote:
> Ar Maw, 2006-10-31 am 21:22 -0800, ysgrifennodd Linus Torvalds:
>> (We had the same issue with "PCI IDE controller". Some PCI IDE controllers
>> are clearly exactly that from a programming interface standpoint, but
>> because they support RAID in hardware, they claim to be RAID controllers,
>> since that is more "glamorous". Gaah ;^).
>
> Actually its far uglier than that. With one exception they don't support
> hardware raid mode, they use the RAID class tag to stop other OS drivers
> grabbing the interface or seeing it directly as un-raided software raid.
Note that a lot of the software raid controllers actually have full
hardware RAID acceleration in the chipset (single block command is automatically
remapped across several drives of a RAID 0/1/10 configuration, reducing bus
transactions and bandwidth requirements.
But they still require a driver do perform the RAID management,
and are thus not true "hardware" RAID. But they are higher on the
food chain than total "pretend" RAID devices.
Cheers
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists