[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061101175112.GB22976@in.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 23:21:12 +0530
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>
To: Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>
Cc: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>, dev@...nvz.org,
sekharan@...ibm.com, ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net,
balbir@...ibm.com, haveblue@...ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pj@....com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
rohitseth@...gle.com, menage@...gle.com, devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] Resource Management - Infrastructure choices
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 08:04:01AM -0800, Matt Helsley wrote:
> > >> 3. Configfs may be easily implemented later as an additional
> > >> interface. I propose the following solution:
> > >
> > > Ideally we should have one interface - either syscall or configfs - and
> > > not both.
>
> To incorporate all feedback perhaps we should replace "configfs" with
> "filesystem".
Yes, you are right.
--
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists