[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <454923F7.8070202@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 14:47:19 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: Derek Fults <dfults@....com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Updated, add get_range, allows a hyhpenated range to
get_options
Derek Fults wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 12:25 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> Derek Fults wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 11:52 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>> Derek Fults wrote:
>>>>> This allows a hyphenated range of positive numbers M-N, in the string
>>>>> passed to command line helper function, get_options. This will expand
>>>>> the range and insert the values[M, M+1, ..., N] into the ints array in
>>>>> get_options.
>>>>>
>>>>> Currently the command line option "isolcpus=" takes as its argument a
>>>>> list of cpus.
>>>>> Format: <cpu number>,...,<cpu number>
>>>>> This can get extremely long when isolating the majority of cpus on a
>>>>> large system. Valid values of <cpu_number> include all cpus, 0 to
>>>>> "number of CPUs in system - 1".
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Derek Fults <dfults@....com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Index: linux/lib/cmdline.c
>>>>> ===================================================================
>>>>> --- linux.orig/lib/cmdline.c 2006-09-19 22:42:06.000000000 -0500
>>>>> +++ linux/lib/cmdline.c 2006-11-01 12:36:20.059166727 -0600
>>>>> @@ -16,6 +16,23 @@
>>>>> #include <linux/kernel.h>
>>>>> #include <linux/string.h>
>>>>>
>>>>> +/**
>>>>> + * If a hyphen was found in get_option, this will handle the
>>>>> + * range of numbers, M-N. This will expand the range and insert
>>>>> + * the values[M, M+1, ..., N] into the ints array in get_options.
>>>>> + */
>>>> Derek,
>>>> Thanks for persisting thru this. It's all fine for me except the
>>>> comment block above. If a comment block begins with "/**", then
>>>> it's supposed to be in kernel-doc format (see
>>>> Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt), with function name &
>>>> parameters (if applicable). However, that mostly needs to be done
>>>> for non-static functions, so probably just change /** to /*
>>>> and leave the rest of the comment block as is.
>>>> My other comment-block comment was also about kernel long-comment
>>>> style, which is
>>>> /*
>>>> * begin
>>>> * more
>>>> * end
>>>> */
>>>> so now you have achieved that also, so thanks again.
>>> I fixed both comments to match that format. Thanks for all the help and
>>> your patience.
>>> I'm posting the new patch in this replay. Is that an acceptable
>>> practice, or does one normally post all fixes to a patch in a new
>>> message?
>> It happens both ways, but since this is mostly new code/feature,
>> I suggest that you repost it and also cc: akpm@...l.org on it.
>>
>> And it still needs a user. Will you be converting isolcpus=
>> to use this functionality?
>> It likely won't be merged until it has a user.
>>
> Isolcpus will be using this code, but it does not need to be converted
> in the kernel. Isolated_cpu_setup() gets its string from the command
> line and then makes the call to get_options with that string. There is
Ack that.
> a reference to the format of isolcpus= in kernel-parameters.txt, that
> could reflect this enhancement.
> Instead of:
> Format: <cpu number>,...,<cpu number>
>
> change to:
> Format <cpu number>,...,<cpu number>-<cpu number>
> <cpu number>-<cpu number> must be a positive range in ascending order.
Can you make that change too, please?
--
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists