[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061101233250.GA17706@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 18:32:50 -0500
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Gautham Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Remove hotplug cpu crap from cpufreq.
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 03:09:52PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Hmm. People _have_ given a damn, and I think you were even cc'd.
You're right. In my defense, that stuff arrived the day I went
on vacation for two weeks, and I subsequently forgot all about it.
Looking back over that thread though, a few people seemed to pick a
number of holes in the patches, and there are some real gems in that
thread like.
> Really, the hotplug locking rules are fairly simple-
>
> 1. If you are in cpu hotplug callback path, don't take any lock.
Which is just great, as afair, the cpufreq locks were there _before_
someone liberally sprinkled lock_cpu_hotplug() everywhere.
> Right now, for 2.6.19, I'd prefer to not touch that mess unless there are
> known conditions that actually cause more problems than just stupid
> warnings..
>From what I can tell from looking at that thread back in August,
it went on for a while with a number of people picking holes in the
proposed patches, but there wasn't any reposted after that, and
certainly nothing that ended up in -mm.
_something_ needs to be done. If someone wants to fix it, great, but
until we see something mergable, we're left in this half-assed state
which is freaking people out.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists