lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f46018bb0610311833x75001040md57341bc568a8902@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 31 Oct 2006 21:33:11 -0500
From:	"Holden Karau" <holden@...scanfly.ca>
To:	"OGAWA Hirofumi" <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Cc:	"Holden Karau" <holdenk@...dros.com>,
	"Josef Sipek" <jsipek@....cs.sunysb.edu>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "akpm@...l.org" <akpm@...l.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Nick Piggin" <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
	"Jörn Engel" <joern@...nheim.fh-wedel.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes revised

Whoops, sorry about that. Yes it would improve performance on fat12 &
fat16 [although I haven't tested it with fat12]. What I meant by that
sentance is that, fat sync performance is pretty bad with or without
my patch, its just slightly less worse with my patch :-)

On 10/31/06, OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp> wrote:
> "Holden Karau" <holden@...scanfly.ca> writes:
>
> > This patch is just meant to make fat32 sync performance better, not
> > necessarily make it usable for everyone [one step at a time and all
> > that].
>
> Sorry, I can't see your point. The FAT12 and FAT16 also have backup FAT.
> And the your patch didn't make performance better, right?
> --
> OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
>


-- 
Cell: 613-276-1645
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ