linux-kernel - Re: [Devel] Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] Resource Management

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4549ADA2.5080404@openvz.org>
Date:	Thu, 02 Nov 2006 11:34:42 +0300
From:	Kir Kolyshkin <kir@...nvz.org>
To:	Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>
CC:	Kir Kolyshkin <kir@...nvz.org>, devel@...nvz.org, vatsa@...ibm.com,
	dev@...nvz.org, sekharan@...ibm.com,
	ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net, balbir@...ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pj@....com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	rohitseth@...gle.com, Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
	Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>
Subject: Re: [Devel] Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] Resource Management -	Infrastructure
 choices

Matt Helsley wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 02:01 +0300, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
>   
>> cpuunits 10, 20, and 30 assigned to containers X, Y, and Z, and run some
>> CPU-intensive tasks in all the containers, X will be given
>> 10/(10+20+30), or 20% of CPU time, Y -- 20/50, i.e. 40%, while Z gets
>>     
>
> nit: I don't think this math is correct.
>
> Shouldn't they all have the same denominator (60), or am I
> misunderstanding something?
>
> If so then it should be:
> X = 10/60      16.666...%
> Y = 20/60      33.333...%
> Z = 30/60      50.0%
> Total:        100.0%
>   
Ughm. You are totally correct of course, I must've been very tired
yesterday night :-\


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/