[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061102190700.GQ13555@kernel.dk>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 20:07:01 +0100
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, tytso@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] splice : Must fully check for fifos
On Thu, Nov 02 2006, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> With the patch this time :( Sorry guys
>
> Hi Andrew
>
> I think this patch is necessary. It's quite easy to crash a 2.6.19-rc4 box :(
>
> AFAIK the problem come from inode-diet (by Theodore Ts'o, (2006/Sep/27))
>
> Thank you
>
> [PATCH] splice : Must fully check for FIFO
>
> It appears that i_pipe, i_cdev and i_bdev share the same memory location
> (anonymous union in struct inode) since commits
> 577c4eb09d1034d0739e3135fd2cff50588024be
> eaf796e7ef6014f208c409b2b14fddcfaafe7e3a
>
> Because of that, testing i_pipe being NULL is not anymore sufficient
> to tell if an inode is a FIFO or not.
>
> Therefore, we must use the S_ISFIFO(inode->i_mode) test before
> assuming i_pipe pointer is pointing to a struct pipe_inode_info.
Indeed, the inode slimming introduced this bug. I'll queue up a test run
of things and send it upstream, thanks for catching this.
--
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists