[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <653402b90611021133i35683ac4i5f4da4098373603c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 19:33:48 +0000
From: "Miguel Ojeda" <maxextreme@...il.com>
To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: Franck <vagabon.xyz@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH update6] drivers: add LCD support
On 11/2/06, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 14:44:56 +0000
> "Miguel Ojeda" <maxextreme@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > > Now let's say that some of the kernel frame buffer data are in the
> > > data cache and never be invalidate during this example. The
> >
> > Sorry, I don't understand what do you mean with this sentence.
>
> Some CPU architectures experience what Documentation/cachetlb.txt calls
> "virtual aliasing in the data cache".
>
> If you map the same physical page at virtual address A1 and also at another
> virtual address A2 then writes to address A1 do not necessarily appear
> correctly at address A2. This because the write to A1 is stuck in the CPU
> cache and the CPU hardware doesn't know that read from A2 is accessing the
> same page.
>
> The solutions to this are:
>
> a) add lots of flushing everywhere (see Documentation/cachetlb.txt, I
> guess) (this documentation is maddening: it uses the term "flush" for
> both writeback and for invalidation. In this context,
> flush==writeback).
>
> b) If you select the correct virtual addresses for A1 and A2 (ie: ensure
> that the mmap() handler returns an address which correlates with the
> page's kernel address) then apparently the aliasing goes away.
>
> So, for example, if the kernel's view of the page is at 0xd0102000
> then you make sure that userspace's address for the page is at
> 0xnnn02000 (for some length of nnn).
>
> I don't know what the mmap handler has to do to arrange for this to
> happen.
>
> c) add `depends on x86' to your Kconfig ;)
I really like portable stuff :)
>
>
> davem and rmk are (amongst others) the guys for this stuff. afaik it isn't
> documented anywhere.
>
Whoa, thanks you for the long explanation. May 2.6.18-new vmalloc
related functions help correlating userspace & kernel addresses? I
will try them and come with an answer tomorrow.
Quoting http://lwn.net/Articles/2.6-kernel-api/
"Some functions have been added to make it easy for kernel code to
allocate a buffer with vmalloc() and map it into user space. They are:
void *vmalloc_user(unsigned long size);
void *vmalloc_32_user(unsigned long size);
int remap_vmalloc_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, void *addr,
unsigned long pgoff);
The first two functions are a form of vmalloc() which obtain memory
intended to be mapped into user space; among other things, they zero
the entire range to avoid leaking data. vmalloc_32_user() allocates
low memory only. A call to remap_vmalloc_range() will complete the
job; it will refuse, however, to remap memory which has not been
allocated with one of the two functions above."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists