[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061102121027.676db964.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 12:10:27 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard@...e.fr>,
Rajesh Shah <rajesh.shah@...el.com>, toralf.foerster@....de,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 21:02:01 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tuesday, 31 October 2006 20:56, you wrote:
> > This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.19-rc4 compared to 2.6.18
> > that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
>
> Can we please add the following two to the list of known regressions:
Balls are being dropped.
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7082
So this was a good patch but because of a bug in ne2k-pci which nobody is
fixing we need to drop it?
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7207
Auke, Jesse - can you please opine on this?
> They are regressions with respect to 2.6.17.x kernels, but still.
>
> In both cases the commits that cause or trigger the problem have been
> identified. Moreover in the first case everyone involved seems to agree that
> the commit should be reverted (at least temporarily).
>
> Greetings,
> Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists