[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1162502667.6071.66.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 16:24:27 -0500
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
Karl MacMillan <kmacmill@...hat.com>, jmorris@...ei.org,
chrisw@...s-sol.org, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, aviro@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Security issues with local filesystem caching
On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 20:38 +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no> wrote:
>
> > Just why are you doing all this? Why do we need a back-end that requires
> > all this extra client-side security infrastructure in order to work?
>
> Well, both Christoph and Al are of the opinion that I should be using
> vfs_mkdir() and co rather than bypassing the security and calling inode ops
> directly.
...but why are you needing to call vfs_mkdir? I thought the standard
cachefs backend just uses a pool of files, rather like the original AFS
cache did. Are you trying to mirror the layout and the permissions of
the NFS filesystem? That is a lot more work than it is worth...
> Also I should be setting security labels on the files I create.
To what end? These files shouldn't need to be made visible to userland
at all.
Cheers,
Trond
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists