[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200611022240.41770.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 22:40:40 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard@...e.fr>,
Rajesh Shah <rajesh.shah@...el.com>, toralf.foerster@....de,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions
On Thursday, 2 November 2006 22:26, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 09:02:01PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> Ji Rafael,
>
> > On Tuesday, 31 October 2006 20:56, you wrote:
> > > This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.19-rc4 compared to 2.6.18
> > > that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
> >
> > Can we please add the following two to the list of known regressions:
> >
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7082
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7207
> >
> > They are regressions with respect to 2.6.17.x kernels, but still.
> >...
>
> I'm sorry, but I'm only tracking regressions since 2.6.18 - "regressions
> since the latest stable kernel" is a clear border, and the number of
> post-2.6.18 regressions is high enough that adding even more
> regressions to my list wouldn't make sense.
Fair enough.
Greetings,
Rafael
--
You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
R. Buckminster Fuller
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists