[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <FFECF24D2A7F6D418B9511AF6F358602F2D4E1@shacnexch2.atitech.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 11:43:38 +0800
From: "Conke Hu" <conke.hu@....com>
To: "Jun Sun" <jsun@...sun.net>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Can Linux live without DMA zone?
It seems a good idea.
Is dma zone is still necessay on most modern computers?
Best regards,
Conke @ AMD, Inc.
-----Original Message-----
From: linux-kernel-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Jun Sun
Sent: 2006年11月2日 10:16
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Can Linux live without DMA zone?
I am trying to reserve a block of memory (>16MB) starting from 0 and hide it
from kernel. A consequence is that DMA zone now has size 0. That causes
many drivers to grief (OOMs).
I see two ways out:
1. Modify individual drivers and convince them not to alloc with GFP_DMA.
I have been trying to do this but do not seem to see an end of it. :)
2. Simply lie and increase MAX_DMA_ADDRESS to really big (like 1GB) so that
the whole memory region belongs to DMA zone.
#2 sounds pretty hackish. I am sure something bad will happen
sooner or later (like what?). But so far it appears to be working fine.
The fundamental question is: Has anybody tried to run Linux without 0 sized
DMA zone before? Am I doing something that nobody has done before (which is
something really hard to believe these days with Linux :P)?
Cheers.
Jun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists