linux-kernel - Re: irqpoll kernel option hurts performance?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1162554724.12810.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Fri, 03 Nov 2006 11:52:04 +0000
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	xp newbie <xp_newbie@...oo.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: irqpoll kernel option hurts performance?

Ar Iau, 2006-11-02 am 21:37 -0800, ysgrifennodd xp newbie:
> specified the "irqpoll" option to boot the installation CD, is the
> system doomed to always work in "IRQ polling mode" (which is much more
> CPU wasteful if I understand this correctly)? Am I really using my
> hardware now in less than optimal manner (like in PIO vs. DMA, for
> example)?

irqpoll has a small impact, how big depends what the box does (on a
gigabit network firewall its bad news, on a typical desktop its not
measurable).

IRQ problems of the form you report can arise from a couple of places -
one is vendors getting IRQ routing tables wrong (suprisingly common),
the other may be a Linux bug.

Checking for a BIOS update may therefore be useful. 

Is this a VIA chipset machine ?

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/