[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1162560154.2801.13.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 08:22:34 -0500
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
To: Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>
Cc: Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jes Sorensen <jes@....com>,
LSE-Tech <lse-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Chandra S Seetharaman <sekharan@...ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com>, linux-audit@...hat.com,
Paul Jackson <pj@....com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] Task Watchers v2: Task watchers v2
On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 20:22 -0800, Matt Helsley wrote:
> +/*
> + * Watch for events occuring within a task and call the supplied
> function
> + * when (and only when) the given event happens.
> + * Only non-modular kernel code may register functions as
> task_watchers.
> + */
> +#define task_watcher_func(ev, fn) \
> +static task_watcher_fn __task_watcher_##ev##_##fn __attribute_used__
> \
> + __attribute__ ((__section__ (".task_watchers." #ev))) = fn
> +#else
> +#error "task_watcher() macro may not be used in modules."
> +#endif
You should make this TASK_WATCHER_FUNC() or even just TASK_WATCHER(). It
looks a little goofy in the code that uses it.
Looking at it now could you do something like,
static int __task_watcher_init
audit_alloc(unsigned long val, struct task_struct *tsk)
Instead of a macro? Might be a little less invasive.
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists