Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0611031049120.7173@debian.freesoft.org>
Date:	Fri, 3 Nov 2006 10:58:09 -0500 (EST)
From:	Brent Baccala <cosine@...esoft.org>
To:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: async I/O seems to be blocking on 2.6.15

On Fri, 3 Nov 2006, Jens Axboe wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 03 2006, Brent Baccala wrote:
>> Hello -
>>
>> I'm running 2.6.15 (Debian) on a Pentium M laptop, PCI attached ext3
>> filesystem.
>>
>> I'm writing my first asynchronous I/O program, and for a while I
>> thought I was really doing something wrong, but more and more I'm
>> starting to conclude that the problem might be in the kernel.
>>
>> Basically, I've narrowed things down to a test program which opens a
>> large (700 MB) file in O_DIRECT mode and fires off 100 one MB async
>> reads for the first 100 MB of data.  The enqueues take about 5 seconds
>> to complete, which is also about the amount of time this disk needs to
>> read 100 MB, so I suspect that it's blocking.
>>
>> I've gotten the POSIX AIO interface at least tolerably running using
>> the GLIBC thread-based implementation, but I really want the native
>> interface working.
>>
>> I whittled the test program down to use system calls instead of the
>> POSIX AIO library, and I'm attaching a copy.  You put a big file at
>> 'testfile' (it just reads it) and run the program:
>>
>>
>> baccala@...ian ~/src/endgame$ time ./testaio
>> Enqueues starting
>> Enqueues complete
>>
>> real    0m5.327s
>> user    0m0.004s
>> sys     0m0.740s
>> baccala@...ian ~/src/endgame$
>>
>>
>> Of that five seconds, it's almost all spent between the two "enqueues"
>> messages.
>
> You don't mention what hardware you are running this on (the disk sub
> system). io_submit() will block, if you run out of block layer requests.
> We have 128 of those by default, but if your io ends up getting chopped
> into somewhat smaller bits than 1MiB each, then you end up having to
> block on allocation of those. So lets say your /src is mounted on
> /dev/sdaX, try:
>
> # echo 512 > /sys/block/sda/queue/nr_requests
>
> (substitute sda for whatever device your /src is on)
>
> and re-test. The time between starting and complete should be a lot
> smaller, now that you are not blocking on blkdev request allocation. You
> may also want to look at the max_sectors_kb in the queue/ directory,
> that'll tell you how large a single io will be at most once it reaches
> the driver.
>
> -- 
> Jens Axboe
>

OK, good question.  Here's what the kernel reports about the controller:

ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx
ALI15X3: IDE controller at PCI slot 0000:00:04.0
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:04.0[A]: no GSI
ALI15X3: chipset revision 195
ALI15X3: not 100%% native mode: will probe irqs later
     ide0: BM-DMA at 0xeff0-0xeff7, BIOS settings: hda:DMA, hdb:pio
ALI15X3: simplex device: DMA forced
     ide1: BM-DMA at 0xeff8-0xefff, BIOS settings: hdc:DMA, hdd:DMA

Your suggestion definitely helped!  /proc/sys/block/hda/queue/max_sectors_kb
reported 128, so I tried:

# echo 1024 > /sys/block/hda/queue/nr_requests

And am now definately seeing async behavior!

The enqueues still take a noticable amount of time, though, just a lot
less than before.  They average 1 second total.  That's 100 one-MB
reads, broken down into 128 KB blocks, I suppose, for a total of 800
low-level reads.  Setting nr_requests higher (2048) doesn't seem to do
any more good.

I can see that you've put me on the right track, but I am still
puzzling... any idea what the remaining second is being used for?



 					-bwb

 					Brent Baccala
 					cosine@...esoft.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists