[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m364dwju0q.fsf@defiant.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:54:13 +0100
From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: Phillip Susi <psusi@....rr.com>, Jun Sun <jsun@...sun.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Can Linux live without DMA zone?
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> writes:
> you're right in theory, but the kernel only has a few pools of memory
> available, but not at every bit boundary. there is a 32 bit pool
> (GFP_DMA32) on some, a 30-ish bit pool (GFP_KERNEL) on others, and a 24
> bit pool (GFP_DMA) with basically nothing inbetween.
Perhaps naive question, but... what's wrong with allocating memory
from the top (within given address mask[1], size-wise)? I think we
don't allocate more than 1 page with kmalloc anymore, do we?
[1] - some devices (a specific StrongARM only?) need non-continuous
masks due to a hardware bug(s).
--
Krzysztof Halasa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists