[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061103181421.GA602@oleg>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 21:14:21 +0300
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, arjan <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: fix delayacct locking bug
On 11/03, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> ======================================================
> [ INFO: soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock order detected ]
> 2.6.19-rc4 #1
> ------------------------------------------------------
> mm_tester/1875 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
> (&tsk->delays->lock){--..}, at: [<c0156652>] __delayacct_add_tsk+0x131/0x1d3
>
> and this task is already holding:
> (&sighand->siglock){.+..}, at: [<c0156b69>] taskstats_exit_send+0x52/0x3b2
> which would create a new lock dependency:
> (&sighand->siglock){.+..} -> (&tsk->delays->lock){--..}
Thanks.
I introduced this bug in
"[PATCH 5/6] taskstats: kill ->taskstats_lock in favor of ->siglock"
Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists