[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061103195146.GK13381@stusta.de>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 20:51:46 +0100
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mikulas@...ax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Cc: Jörn Engel <joern@...nheim.fh-wedel.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: New filesystem for Linux
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 02:31:46PM +0100, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> >>>I am fully aware the counters are effectively 48-bit. If they were
> >>>just 32-bit, you would likely have hit the problem yourself already.
> >>
> >>Given the seek time 0.01s, 31-bit value would last for minimum time of 248
> >>days when doing only syncs and nothing else. 47-bit value will last for
> >>reasonably long.
> >
> >So you can at most do one transaction per drive seek? That would
> >definitely solve the overflow case, but hardly sounds like a
> >high-performance filesystem. :)
>
> Really it can batch any number of modifications into one transaction
> (unless fsync or sync is called). Transaction is closed only on
> fsync/sync, if 2 minutes pass (can be adjusted) or when the disk runs out
> of space.
O_DIRECT ?
O_SYNC ?
> Mikulas
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists