linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/7] paravirtualization: header and stubs for paravirtualizing critical operations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200611032209.40235.ak@suse.de>
Date:	Fri, 3 Nov 2006 22:09:40 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
Cc:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
	virtualization@...ts.osdl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...l.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] paravirtualization: header and stubs for	paravirtualizing critical operations


> 
> Sounds like desc.h got reordered.  Somewhere, there was a broken patch 
> once that did this, I thought we fixed that.

I think I got Rusty's latest patches that I found in my mailbox.

I haven't looked at desc.h, but at least processor.h ordering was totally
b0rken (e.g. #define __cpuid native_cpuid was after several uses). I fixed
that to make at least the CONFIG_PARAVIRT not set case compile.

I can't see how this ever worked either.

Haven't attempted the CONFIG_PARAVIRT case which apparently needs more work
(it is currently marked CONFIG_BROKEN) 

Can someone double check this is the correct patchkit?

ftp://ftp.frstfloor.org/pub/ak/x86_64/quilt/patches/paravirt*

-Andi


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/