[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17738.50949.287850.74986@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 15:35:17 +1100
From: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bdev: fix ->bd_part_count leak
On Thursday November 2, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl wrote:
>
> Don't leak a ->bd_part_count when the partition open fails with -ENXIO.
>
Acked-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Thanks. It took me a while to see why that was a correct fix. I
wasn't noticing the 'if (bdev != bdev->bd_contains)' which is only
true after __blkdev_get(whole, ...., 1) has been called.
NeilBrown
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> ---
> fs/block_dev.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6-mm/fs/block_dev.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-mm.orig/fs/block_dev.c
> +++ linux-2.6-mm/fs/block_dev.c
> @@ -907,6 +907,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(bd_set_size);
>
> static int __blkdev_get(struct block_device *bdev, mode_t mode, unsigned flags,
> int for_part);
> +static int __blkdev_put(struct block_device *bdev, int for_part);
>
> static int do_open(struct block_device *bdev, struct file *file, int for_part)
> {
> @@ -992,7 +993,7 @@ out_first:
> bdev->bd_disk = NULL;
> bdev->bd_inode->i_data.backing_dev_info = &default_backing_dev_info;
> if (bdev != bdev->bd_contains)
> - blkdev_put(bdev->bd_contains);
> + __blkdev_put(bdev->bd_contains, 1);
> bdev->bd_contains = NULL;
> put_disk(disk);
> module_put(owner);
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists