[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061104172954.GA3668@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 18:29:54 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Falk Hueffner <falk@...ian.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Subject: Re: ipc/msg.c "cleanup" breaks fakeroot on Alpha
* Falk Hueffner <falk@...ian.org> wrote:
> - struct msg_msg* volatile r_msg;
> + volatile struct msg_msg *r_msg;
> };
>
> breaks fakeroot on Alpha (variously hangs or oopses). Backing it out
> of 2.6.19-rc4 fixes the issue. Is it possible that this change (which
> clearly does change semantics) was made in error?
correct, it was an error, lets back it out.
Another interesting question is: what in the IPC code relies on the
volatility of this field, and shouldnt it be converted to explicit
barriers instead?
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists