lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0611041938490.24713@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 19:40:13 +0100 (CET) From: Mikulas Patocka <mikulas@...ax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: New filesystem for Linux > The problem with a per_cpu biglock is that you may consume a lot of RAM for > big NR_CPUS. Count 32 KB per 'biglock' if NR_CPUS=1024 Does one Linux kernel run on system with 1024 cpus? I guess it must fry spinlocks... (or even lockup due to spinlock livelocks) Mikulas - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/