[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1162758984.14695.22.camel@lappy>
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 21:36:23 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, arjan <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH] debug workqueue locking sanity
Workqueue functions should not leak locks, assert so, printing the
last function ran.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
Index: linux-2.6-twins/kernel/workqueue.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-twins.orig/kernel/workqueue.c 2006-11-05 21:04:13.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6-twins/kernel/workqueue.c 2006-11-05 21:16:05.000000000 +0100
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
#include <linux/kthread.h>
#include <linux/hardirq.h>
#include <linux/mempolicy.h>
+#include <linux/kallsyms.h>
/*
* The per-CPU workqueue (if single thread, we always use the first
@@ -222,6 +223,21 @@ static void run_workqueue(struct cpu_wor
clear_bit(0, &work->pending);
f(data);
+ if (unlikely(in_atomic()
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
+ || current->lockdep_depth > 0
+#endif
+ )) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "BUG: workqueue leaked lock or atomic: "
+ "%s/0x%08x/%d\n",
+ current->comm, preempt_count(),
+ current->pid);
+ printk(KERN_ERR " last function: ");
+ print_symbol("%s\n", (unsigned long)f);
+ debug_show_held_locks(current);
+ dump_stack();
+ }
+
spin_lock_irqsave(&cwq->lock, flags);
cwq->remove_sequence++;
wake_up(&cwq->work_done);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists