[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1162735599.3160.91.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 15:06:39 +0100
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
Cc: andrew@...rond.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Scsi cdrom naming confusion; sr or scd?
On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 12:33 +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > "The prefix /dev/sr (instead of /dev/scd) has been deprecated"
> >
> >but booting 2.6.18.2 from a scsi CD only works if I pass the kernel
> >parameter root=/dev/sr0 and fails with root=/dev/scd0
> >
> >I guess the kernel ought to be taught about the scd* names aswell?
>
> brw-r----- 1 root disk 11, 0 Mar 19 2005 /dev/scd0
> brw-r----- 1 root disk 11, 0 Mar 19 2005 /dev/sr0
>
> Plus I see sr0 being far more commonly used than scd0.
> So I guess the doc is wrong.
and this is why it's wrong to make naming policy a kernel thing!
Userspace is the right place to do this (and there I suspect the name
will end up being /dev/cdrom)...... the kernel really shouldn't care at
all what the name is.
(I know for root= it currently has to if you don't have an initrd but..
well... that's sort of a nasty interface anyway; what if you have a usb
cdrom drive connected for example.. suddenly all your names changed)
--
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com
Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists