lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 13:58:18 +0100 From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> To: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru> Cc: Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@...gsvamp.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [take22 0/4] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism. Hi! > > Can you explain why kevent is better than kqueue? > > According to my tests kevent is noticebly faster. > It is already too big flag that old system should not be used. > And half of my previous mail to you shows why kevent is better/different > from kqueue. You shown why it is _different_. How much faster is "noticebly faster"? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists