[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1162830033.4715.201.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 17:20:32 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Andreas Mohr <andi@...x01.fht-esslingen.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, len.brown@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CONFIG_NO_HZ: missed ticks, stall (keyb IRQ required)
[2.6.18-rc4-mm1]
On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 01:06 +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> ACPI: lapic on CPU 0 stops in C2[C2]
> How probable is it that the APIC timer got killed due to mis-programming
> in Linux versus VIA chipset design garbage probability? I.e. do you think
> there's a chance to fix C2 malfunction by going into the innards of
> VIA chipsets operation?
> How useful would it be to simply disable C2 operation (but not C1)
> in CONFIG_NO_HZ mode after's been determined to kill APIC timer?:
No, we better disable local apic timer in that case. What happens if you
boot your machine with ACPI disabled ?
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists