linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm/slab.c: whitespace cleanup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <653402b90611060827t7eaff5acl1a5cbc36c772ba29@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 6 Nov 2006 16:27:46 +0000
From:	"Miguel Ojeda" <maxextreme@...il.com>
To:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc:	akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/slab.c: whitespace cleanup

On 11/6/06, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi> wrote:
> On 11/6/06, Miguel Ojeda Sandonis <maxextreme@...il.com> wrote:
> > whitespace cleanup for mm/slab.c
>
> [snip]
>
> > -       addr = (unsigned long *)&((char *)addr)[obj_offset(cachep)];
> > +       addr = (unsigned long *)((char *)addr + obj_offset(cachep));
>
> Call me old-fashioned, but this doesn't count as whitespace cleanup.
> Anyway, why do you want to do this? The coding style changes seem too
> minor to be worth it...
>
>                                Pekka
>

Isn't "p+i" more correct / easy to understand than "&p[i]"?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/