[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061106172049.GA19283@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 12:20:49 -0500
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Christian <christiand59@....de>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey_y_starikovskiy@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [discuss] Linux 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v2)
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 04:43:13PM +0100, Christian wrote:
> > Did you have CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR=y in 2.6.18, or did
> > CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR=m, CONFIG_X86_POWERNOW_K8=y work for you in 2.6.18?
>
> It worked with CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR=m in 2.6.18-rc7. Since 2.6.19-rc1 it
> doesn't work anymore with CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR=m.
>
> user@...ntu:~/Projekte/linux-2.6.18-rc7$ grep -i ACPI_PROCESSOR /boot/config-2.6.18-rc7
> CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR=m
>
> user@...ntu:~/Projekte/linux-2.6.18-rc7$
> grep -Ei "POWERNOW_K8" /boot/config-2.6.18-rc7
> CONFIG_X86_POWERNOW_K8=m
> CONFIG_X86_POWERNOW_K8_ACPI=y
>
> +++ There's a difference in 2.6.19! CONFIG_X86_POWERNOW_K8_ACPI is gone +++
I don't understand how this was allowed. Because when I try this
with a 2.6.18 tree.. (nothing changed between -rc7 and final for cpufreq)
<editted a .config to match your config>
$ grep ACPI_PROCESSOR .config
CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR=m
$ grep POWERNOW_K8 .config
CONFIG_X86_POWERNOW_K8=y
CONFIG_X86_POWERNOW_K8_ACPI=y
and then after a make oldconfig the CONFIG_X86_POWERNOW_K8_ACPI is removed
as it isn't valid.
Did you edit your .config by hand ?
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists