[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200611062040.44868.a1426z@gawab.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 20:40:44 +0300
From: Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: New filesystem for Linux
Albert Cahalan wrote:
> On 11/4/06, Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@...-owl.de> wrote:
> > Albert Cahalan <acahalan@...il.com> wrote:
> > > BTW, a person with disk recovery experience told me that drives
> > > will sometimes reorder the sectors. Sector 42 becomes sector 7732,
> > > sector 880880 becomes sector 12345, etc. The very best filesystems
> > > can handle with without data loss. (for example, ZFS) Merely great
> > > filesystems will at least recognize that the data has been trashed.
> >
> > Uh? This should be transparent to the host computer, so logical sector
> > numbers won't change.
>
> "should be" does not imply "won't" :-)
>
> On a drive which is capable of remapping sectors, imagine what
> happens if the remapping data itself is corrupted. (the user data
> is perfectly fine and is not being relocated)
I would consider this a defective drive.
> What I mean is that the logical sector numbers not only change,
> but they are the only thing changing. The user data never moves
> to a different physical location, and is never intended to move.
> The user data is perfectly readable. It just appears in the wrong
> place as viewed by the OS.
Just like defective drive electronics; the data is ok, but the electronics
corrupts the I/O.
No FS could help you there, AFAIK.
BTW, why is this thread not on fsdevel?
Thanks!
--
Al
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists