linux-kernel - Re: [discuss] Linux 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 6 Nov 2006 12:49:28 -0500
From:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Cc:	Christian <christiand59@....de>,
	Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey_y_starikovskiy@...ux.intel.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, cpufreq@...ts.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [discuss] Linux 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v2)

On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 06:35:28PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
 
 > config X86_POWERNOW_K8
 >         tristate "AMD Opteron/Athlon64 PowerNow!"
 >         select CPU_FREQ_TABLE
 > 	depends (ACPI_PROCESSOR || ACPI_PROCESSOR=n)
 > 
 > But in the end, the best solution depends on how many percent of the 
 > X86_POWERNOW_K8 users have Christian's problem of requiring 
 > ACPI_PROCESSOR. If there are only very few people with this problem, I'd 
 > say leave it as it is.

Well, it's been this way for a while, and only recently this has come up.
There was a similar report for powernow-k7, which has a similar construct.

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/