linux-kernel - Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 2/6] Cpusets hooked into containers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <454ED769.8040302@in.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 06 Nov 2006 12:04:17 +0530
From:	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>
To:	menage@...gle.com
CC:	akpm@...l.org, pj@....com, sekharan@...ibm.com,
	ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net, jlan@....com, Simon.Derr@...l.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mbligh@...gle.com, winget@...gle.com,
	rohitseth@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 2/6] Cpusets hooked into containers

menage@...gle.com wrote:
> This patch removes the process grouping code from the cpusets code,
> instead hooking it into the generic container system. This temporarily
> adds cpuset-specific code in kernel/container.c, which is removed by
> the next patch in the series.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>

I needed the following patches to get the cpuset code to compile.
Inlining two patches makes it hard to distinguish between the patches
and harder to read them, so I am attaching them along with this email.

-- 
	Regards,
	Balbir Singh,
	Linux Technology Center,
	IBM Software Labs

View attachment "fix-cpuset-guarantee-online-cpus-mems-in-subtree.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (940 bytes)

View attachment "fix-cpuset-proc-operations.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (1226 bytes)