[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061106104350.GR13555@kernel.dk>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 11:43:50 +0100
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Brent Baccala <cosine@...esoft.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: async I/O seems to be blocking on 2.6.15
On Mon, Nov 06 2006, Brent Baccala wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Nov 2006, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Nov 03 2006, Brent Baccala wrote:
> >>
> >>Does 7 microseconds seem a bit excessive for an io_submit (and a
> >>gettimeofday)?
> >
> >I guess you mean miliseconds, not microseconds. 7 miliseconds seems way
> >too long. I repeated your test here, and the 100 submits take 97000
> >microseconds here - or 97 miliseconds. So that's a little less than 1
> >msec per io_submit. Still pretty big. You can experiment with oprofile
> >to profile where the kernel spends its time in that period.
> >
> >--
> >Jens Axboe
> >
>
> Yes, of course, milliseconds. I have enough other problems with this
> program (measured in minutes, and no mistake that) that I doubt I'll
> be profiling the kernel any time soon, but thank you for your help.
>
> More than anything else, you've made me understand that I can't just
> fire off a bunch of async requests like I'm tossing peanuts across the
> table. I've really got to pay attention to what's in that kernel
> queue and how it gets managed.
Yeah, I'm afraid so. We really should be returning EAGAIN or something
like that for the congested condition, though.
--
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists