| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1162907070.3138.150.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 14:44:30 +0100 From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> To: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...l.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/14] KVM: x86 emulator On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 15:22 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > Arjan van de Ven wrote: > >> The entire patchset is GPL'ed. Do you mean to make it explicit? If so, > >> how? I'd rather not copy the entire license into each file. > >> > > > > a simple one liner like > > "This file is licensed under the terms of the GPL v2 license" > > (add "or later" if you feel like doing that) > > is going to be generally useful. > > > > At least many many legal departments really prefer at least that minimum > > line to be there for each file; some even want a much longer blurb. > > > > Okay. I hate to use the word "official", but is there an official > position on this somewhere? I don't think there's an hard official rule; just good practice and to take away any unclarity.. . -- if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists