[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0611071015030.4249@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 10:18:44 -0800 (PST)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, akpm@...l.org,
mm-commits@...r.kernel.org, nickpiggin@...oo.com.au,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: + sched-use-tasklet-to-call-balancing.patch added to -mm tree
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
> tasklet_schedule doesn't schedule if there is already one scheduled.
Right.
/* Tasklets --- multithreaded analogue of BHs.
Main feature differing them of generic softirqs: tasklet
is running only on one CPU simultaneously.
Main feature differing them of BHs: different tasklets
may be run simultaneously on different CPUs.
Properties:
* If tasklet_schedule() is called, then tasklet is guaranteed
to be executed on some cpu at least once after this.
^^^^ Crap. Not equivalent. Must be guaranteed to run on the same cpu.
* If the tasklet is already scheduled, but its excecution is still not
started, it will be executed only once.
* If this tasklet is already running on another CPU (or schedule is called
from tasklet itself), it is rescheduled for later.
* Tasklet is strictly serialized wrt itself, but not
wrt another tasklets. If client needs some intertask synchronization,
he makes it with spinlocks.
*/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists