[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061107183459.GG6993@agk.surrey.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 18:34:59 +0000
From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...hat.com,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>,
Srinivasa DS <srinivasa@...ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2.6.19 5/5] fs: freeze_bdev with semaphore not mutex
From: Srinivasa Ds <srinivasa@...ibm.com>
On debugging I found out that,"dmsetup suspend <device name>" calls
"freeze_bdev()",which locks "bd_mount_mutex" to make sure that no new mounts
happen on bdev until thaw_bdev() is called. This "thaw_bdev()" is getting
called when we resume the device through "dmsetup resume <device-name>".
Hence we have 2 processes,one of which locks "bd_mount_mutex"(dmsetup
suspend) and another(dmsetup resume) unlocks it.
Signed-off-by: Srinivasa DS <srinivasa@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>
Cc: dm-devel@...hat.com
Index: linux-2.6.19-rc4/fs/block_dev.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.19-rc4.orig/fs/block_dev.c 2006-11-07 17:06:20.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc4/fs/block_dev.c 2006-11-07 17:26:04.000000000 +0000
@@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ static void init_once(void * foo, kmem_c
{
memset(bdev, 0, sizeof(*bdev));
mutex_init(&bdev->bd_mutex);
- mutex_init(&bdev->bd_mount_mutex);
+ sema_init(&bdev->bd_mount_sem, 1);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bdev->bd_inodes);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bdev->bd_list);
#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS
Index: linux-2.6.19-rc4/fs/buffer.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.19-rc4.orig/fs/buffer.c 2006-11-07 17:06:20.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc4/fs/buffer.c 2006-11-07 17:26:04.000000000 +0000
@@ -188,7 +188,9 @@ struct super_block *freeze_bdev(struct b
{
struct super_block *sb;
- mutex_lock(&bdev->bd_mount_mutex);
+ if (down_trylock(&bdev->bd_mount_sem))
+ return -EBUSY;
+
sb = get_super(bdev);
if (sb && !(sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)) {
sb->s_frozen = SB_FREEZE_WRITE;
@@ -230,7 +232,7 @@ void thaw_bdev(struct block_device *bdev
drop_super(sb);
}
- mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mount_mutex);
+ up(&bdev->bd_mount_sem);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(thaw_bdev);
Index: linux-2.6.19-rc4/fs/super.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.19-rc4.orig/fs/super.c 2006-11-07 17:06:20.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc4/fs/super.c 2006-11-07 17:26:04.000000000 +0000
@@ -735,9 +735,9 @@ int get_sb_bdev(struct file_system_type
* will protect the lockfs code from trying to start a snapshot
* while we are mounting
*/
- mutex_lock(&bdev->bd_mount_mutex);
+ down(&bdev->bd_mount_sem);
s = sget(fs_type, test_bdev_super, set_bdev_super, bdev);
- mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mount_mutex);
+ up(&bdev->bd_mount_sem);
if (IS_ERR(s))
goto error_s;
Index: linux-2.6.19-rc4/include/linux/fs.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.19-rc4.orig/include/linux/fs.h 2006-11-07 17:06:20.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc4/include/linux/fs.h 2006-11-07 17:26:04.000000000 +0000
@@ -456,7 +456,7 @@ struct block_device {
struct inode * bd_inode; /* will die */
int bd_openers;
struct mutex bd_mutex; /* open/close mutex */
- struct mutex bd_mount_mutex; /* mount mutex */
+ struct semaphore bd_mount_sem;
struct list_head bd_inodes;
void * bd_holder;
int bd_holders;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists