[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061107120246.4b6b3f0b.pj@sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 12:02:46 -0800
From: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To: "Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>
Cc: vatsa@...ibm.com, dev@...nvz.org, sekharan@...ibm.com,
ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net, balbir@...ibm.com,
haveblue@...ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
matthltc@...ibm.com, dipankar@...ibm.com, rohitseth@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] Resource Management - Infrastructure choices
Paul M wrote:
> I think it's better to treat resource groups as a common framework for
> resource controllers, rather than a resource controller itself.
You could well be right here - I was just using resource groups
as another good example of a controller. I'll let others decide
if that's one or several controllers.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists