[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061107.125241.39157521.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 12:52:41 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: akpm@...l.org
Cc: jeff@...zik.org, johnpol@....mipt.ru, drepper@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...l.org
Subject: Re: [take21 0/4] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 11:34:00 -0800
> What Evgeniy means here is that copy_to_user() is slower than memcpy() (on
> his machine, with his kernel config, at least).
>
> Which is kinda weird and unexpected and is something which we should
> investigate independently from this project. (Rather than simply going
> and bypassing it!)
It's straightforward to me. :-)
If the kerne memcpy()'s, it uses those nice 4MB PTE mappings to
the kernel pages. With copy_to_user() you run through tiny
4K or 8K PTE mappings which thrash the TLB.
The TLB is therefore able to hold more of the accessed state at
a time if you touch the pages on the kernel side.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists