linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v3)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m1zmb27v2y.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date:	Tue, 07 Nov 2006 15:25:41 -0700
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	olson@...hscale.com
Cc:	"Bryan O'Sullivan" <bos@...pentine.com>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v3)

Dave Olson <olson@...hscale.com> writes:

> On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> | I think we are talking past each other.  I think it is fine but silly
> | to set a standard register that isn't actually used.  It probably makes
> | debugging a little easier but it might also make things a little more
> | confusing because we are doing something totally unnecessary.
>
> I think we are saying exactly the same thing, so I'll leave it at that.

Ok.  I wish it was clear to me that you understood my concerns but you aren't
writing a patch for lspci so it really doesn't matter.

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/