linux-kernel - Re: Poor NFSv4 first impressions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20061107072000.GC21655@elf.ucw.cz>
Date:	Tue, 7 Nov 2006 08:20:00 +0100
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@...il.com>
Cc:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	nfsv4@...ux-nfs.org
Subject: Re: Poor NFSv4 first impressions

> With this patch, I can run just great with NFSv4 home dir (etc)
> mounts; without, I get the symptom of many 0-byte temporary/lock files
> being created and often the inability to create files (!). Be sure to
> allow callback delegation connections in through your firewall for the
> extra performance ;-) .
> 
> Maybe it's too late for these fixes 2.6.19, but they should certainly
> make 2.6.19.1 IMHO.

If they are good enough for 2.6.19.1, they should _definitely_ go into
2.6.19.


								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/