[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <004001c70252$82702570$4b00a8c0@donald>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 10:52:55 +0100
From: "Paul Rolland" <rol@...917.net>
To: "'Jan Engelhardt'" <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
Cc: "'Marc Perkel'" <marc@...kel.com>,
"'Chris Lalancette'" <clalance@...hat.com>,
"'Rafael J. Wysocki'" <rjw@...k.pl>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: could not find filesystem /dev/root
Hello,
> The order in which disks are discovered, is basically
> (1) what module (let's take the "core kernel" as a module
> too) is loaded first (core kernel always comes first)
> (2) running order of the __init functions in a specific module;
> running order mostly defined by linking order
Yes... What is painful is that moving from a configuration with modules
to a configuration without modules, this can change.
> >and resulted in drives changing devices :
> >FC5 Vanilla
> >/dev/sda <---> /dev/sdb
> >/dev/sdb <---> /dev/sdc
> >/dev/sdc <---> /dev/sda
> If you don't want udev, make an initramfs, build your disk driver as
> modules, and load them in the order you want your disks numbered.
>
> udev or initramfs, you ought to choose at least one.
Nope, you don't. I'm now using a kernel without modules for what's disk
related, and unless people (read kernel developpers) change something
in the init order, I'm now with a stable environment, without udev or
initramfs.
Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists